Judicial reconsideration refers to the process that should obligations of parties of a contract become unequal due to some unexpected accident, the judge would reconsider articles of the contract on the basis of a general judgment in the Law, a juristic rule, or verdicts of jurists. There are some opinions as to justification of judicial reconsideration some of which being that of implicit conditioning, occurred lesion, the juristic rule of “negation of harm and difficulty,” and that of “what is possible.” Investigation of such opinions results in this idea that juristic rules of “negation of harm and difficulty” and “what is possible” are more capable of such justification
Moradi, K. (2013). Analysis of Essentials of Judicial Reconsideration in the Iranian Law and Shiite Jurisprudence. Jurisprudence the Essentials of the Islamic Law, 46(2), 321-344. doi: 10.22059/jjfil.2013.51930
MLA
Khadijeh Moradi. "Analysis of Essentials of Judicial Reconsideration in the Iranian Law and Shiite Jurisprudence", Jurisprudence the Essentials of the Islamic Law, 46, 2, 2013, 321-344. doi: 10.22059/jjfil.2013.51930
HARVARD
Moradi, K. (2013). 'Analysis of Essentials of Judicial Reconsideration in the Iranian Law and Shiite Jurisprudence', Jurisprudence the Essentials of the Islamic Law, 46(2), pp. 321-344. doi: 10.22059/jjfil.2013.51930
VANCOUVER
Moradi, K. Analysis of Essentials of Judicial Reconsideration in the Iranian Law and Shiite Jurisprudence. Jurisprudence the Essentials of the Islamic Law, 2013; 46(2): 321-344. doi: 10.22059/jjfil.2013.51930
)