The traditions transmitted from the Infallible Imams (A. S.) are one of the most important resources of jurisprudential rulings. There are some conditions for any tradition to be accepted and Islamic scholars have identified several ways for investigating that whither the conditions are met in a given tradition or not. Some of these conditions are related to the narrators of a tradition, such as justice. One of the ways to narrator’s justice is the originality of justice (Esalat al-adalat), which has been neglected. However, it is obvious that through this principle we can accept the authority of many traditions, if we can prove its validity. Here, in this article, the author has tried to study the validity of this principle.
Abdi, H. (2010). Study of the lack of the validity of the originality of justice in getting to narrator’s justice. Jurisprudence the Essentials of the Islamic Law, 43(1), 95-118.
MLA
Hassan Abdi. "Study of the lack of the validity of the originality of justice in getting to narrator’s justice", Jurisprudence the Essentials of the Islamic Law, 43, 1, 2010, 95-118.
HARVARD
Abdi, H. (2010). 'Study of the lack of the validity of the originality of justice in getting to narrator’s justice', Jurisprudence the Essentials of the Islamic Law, 43(1), pp. 95-118.
VANCOUVER
Abdi, H. Study of the lack of the validity of the originality of justice in getting to narrator’s justice. Jurisprudence the Essentials of the Islamic Law, 2010; 43(1): 95-118.
)